• English
    • ไทย
  • English 
    • English
    • ไทย
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Wisdom Repository Home
  • คณะและวิทยาลัย
  • คณะบริหารธุรกิจ
  • GSBA: Dissertations
  • View Item
  •   Wisdom Repository Home
  • คณะและวิทยาลัย
  • คณะบริหารธุรกิจ
  • GSBA: Dissertations
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of Wisdom RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateResource TypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateResource Types

My Account

Login

Evaluating credit scoring models

by Vesarach Aumeboonsuke

Title:

Evaluating credit scoring models

Author(s):

Vesarach Aumeboonsuke

Advisor:

Dryver, Arthur L, advisor

Degree name:

Doctor of Philosophy

Degree level:

Doctoral

Degree discipline:

Finance

Degree department:

School of Business Administration

Degree grantor:

National Institute of Development Administration

Issued date:

2011

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.14457/NIDA.the.2011.22

Publisher:

National Institute of Development Administration

Abstract:

Evaluating the credit worthiness of credit seekers is a crucial process for financial institutions simply because their existence largely depends on how such a process is conducted. Financial institutions use a variety of credit scoring methods and a variety of criteria to select the best credit scoring methods. The primary purpose of this research is to evaluate the performance of some of the existing popular credit scoring methods that are widely used by financial institutions. The credit scoring methods to be considered for comparison purpose include logistic regression, discriminant analysis, and recursive partitioning. Several statistical criteria to be considered for evaluation include the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic (K-S), the Gini coefficient, and odds ratio at various cut-offs. Much research in the past has compared credit scoring methods through using sets of real-world data. In this paper, however, the comparison of the credit scoring methods has been done by using a set of data generated through simulation in order to acquire extensively representative and sufficiently effective samples; in this way, it is possible to compare and validate the performance of the classification models on the population. This paper simulates the data sets of the population, draw samples from each population set, runs each credit scoring method on each data set, computes the K-S, Gini, and odds ratio for each model for each data set, compares the cross-validation with the K-S, Gini, and odds ratio at various cut-off points, and evaluates the performance of different credit scoring models across different methods, across samples with different ratios of “goods” to “bads”, and across samples drawn from the population with different characteristics. The findings of this research will be useful for financial institutions, especially commercial banks, because they present evidence of how well each credit scoring method can predict the credit score of loan applicants. Banks make lending decisions based on such credit scoring systems, and the lending decision is crucial because it is the source of their revenue. If the bank accepts the applicant that is going into default, then it will have a bad loan, which results in loan losses. On the other hand, if the bank rejects the applicant that is not going into default, then the bank has lost the opportunity to gain more revenue from that applicant. Therefore, ideally, banks would like to use a credit scoring model that has a stable and reliable predictive power across different characteristics of populations and sample sets.

Description:

Thesis (Ph.D. (Finance))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2011

Subject(s):

Credit scoring systems

Resource type:

Dissertation

Extent:

ix, 122 leaves : ill. ; 30 cm.

Type:

Text

File type:

application/pdf

Language:

eng

Rights:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

URI:

http://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/574
Show full item record

Files in this item (CONTENT)

Thumbnail
View
  • nida-diss-b174612.pdf ( 3,065.61 KB )

ทรัพยากรสารสนเทศทั้งหมดในคลังปัญญา ใช้เพื่อประโยชน์ทางการเรียนการสอนและการค้นคว้าเท่านั้น และต้องมีการอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มาทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ ห้ามดัดแปลงเนื้อหา และทำสำเนาต่อ รวมถึงไม่ให้อนุญาตนำไปใช้ประโยชน์เพื่อการค้า ไม่ว่ากรณีใด ๆ ทั้งสิ้น



This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • GSBA: Dissertations [30]

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

Copyright © National Institute of Development Administration | สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์
Library and Information Center | สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
Email: NIDAWR@nida.ac.th    Chat: Facebook Messenger    Facebook: NIDAWisdomRepository
 

 

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

Copyright © National Institute of Development Administration | สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์
Library and Information Center | สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
Email: NIDAWR@nida.ac.th    Chat: Facebook Messenger    Facebook: NIDAWisdomRepository
 

 

‹›×