A comparative corpus-based study of nursing and language teaching research articles: a multidimensional analysis
by Woravit Kitjaroenpaiboon
Title: | A comparative corpus-based study of nursing and language teaching research articles: a multidimensional analysis |
Author(s): | Woravit Kitjaroenpaiboon |
Advisor: | Kanyarat Getkham |
Degree name: | Doctor of Philosophy |
Degree level: | Doctoral |
Degree discipline: | Language and Communication |
Degree department: | School of Language and Communication |
Degree grantor: | National Institute of Development Administration |
Issued date: | 2016 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.14457/NIDA.the.2016.95 |
Publisher: | National Institute of Development Administration |
Abstract: |
This paper presents the results of multidimensional analyses investigating patterns of linguistic features in Nursing Research Article Corpus (NURAC) and Language Teaching Research Article Corpus (LTRAC). The findings showed the nursing research articles contained four stylistic patterns and communicative functions. They are Evaluative Stance Focused, Established Knowledge Focused, Claim Focused, and Intention Focused. The language teaching research articles contained six stylistic patterns and communicative functions. They are Persuasion Focused, Evaluative Stance Focused, Claim Focused, Established Knowledge versus Past Action Focused, Ownership Focused, and Modified Information Focused. An intersectional comparison within NURAC and within LTRAC indicated that each pattern was found in different research article’s conventional sections. An interdisciplinary comparison indicated that three out of the four dimensions in NURAC were also found in LTRAC. Herewith, the findings argue that the professional research article writers employ several stylistic patterns for writing each research article’s conventional section. The use of these patterns depends primarily on the functional properties and the textual variation. A possible reason why some stylistic patterns used in NURAC slightly differ from LTRAC might presumably be due to differences of their writings natures. In the researcher’s opinion, the findings from this dissertation could be beneficial to ESP / EAP course and curriculum designers, teachers of English language in academic writing courses, non-native English and novice researchers and students particularly from these two disciplines for the application of this knowledge to improve their academic writing skills. |
Description: |
Thesis (Ph.D. (Language and Communication))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2016 |
Subject(s): | Teaching -- Language arts
Nursing |
Keyword(s): | วิทยานิพนธ์รางวัลดี
วิทยานิพนธ์ได้รับรางวัล วิทยานิพนธ์ได้รับรางวัลประจำปี 2561 Prize theses |
Resource type: | Dissertation |
Extent: | 357 leaves |
Type: | Text |
File type: | application/pdf |
Language: | eng |
Rights: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
URI: | https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/5818 |
Files in this item (CONTENT) |
|
View ทรัพยากรสารสนเทศทั้งหมดในคลังปัญญา ใช้เพื่อประโยชน์ทางการเรียนการสอนและการค้นคว้าเท่านั้น และต้องมีการอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มาทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ ห้ามดัดแปลงเนื้อหา และทำสำเนาต่อ รวมถึงไม่ให้อนุญาตนำไปใช้ประโยชน์เพื่อการค้า ไม่ว่ากรณีใด ๆ ทั้งสิ้น
|
This item appears in the following Collection(s) |
|
|