• English
    • ไทย
  • English 
    • English
    • ไทย
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Wisdom Repository Home
  • หน่วยงาน
  • สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
  • In Processing
  • Dissertations, Theses, Term Papers
  • View Item
  •   Wisdom Repository Home
  • หน่วยงาน
  • สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
  • In Processing
  • Dissertations, Theses, Term Papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of Wisdom RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateResource TypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateResource Types

My Account

Login

THE FISCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS ON INCOME INEQUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

THE FISCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS ON INCOME INEQUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

by Manwar Hossein Malla; Manwar Hossein Malla; Pairote Pathranarakul; ไพโรจน์ ภัทรนรากุล; National Institute of Development Administration. School of Public Administration

Title:

THE FISCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS ON INCOME INEQUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
THE FISCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS ON INCOME INEQUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

Contributor(s):

National Institute of Development Administration. School of Public Administration

Advisor:

Pairote Pathranarakul
ไพโรจน์ ภัทรนรากุล

Issued date:

3/6/2022

Publisher:

National Institute of Development Administration

Abstract:

This study investigates how fiscal policy and institutional factors influence income distribution within and across countries by employing the panel data technique for 117 countries over the period of 20 years (2000-2019). Based on the ordinary least squares, random effects, fixed effects, two-stage least squares, and system generalized method of moments techniques, the study established the following results. First, the results on the relationship between fiscal policy and income inequality showed that while a few fiscal policy instruments appear to generally reduce income inequality, others increase income inequality in a model involving both developed and developing countries. Thus, public debt, education expenditure, and government consumption reduce income inequality, and direct tax structure also has the potential of reducing income inequality. On the other hand, health expenditure and indirect tax system tend to increase income inequality. Second, with respect to the effect of institutional quality on income inequality, the study found that government effectiveness reduces income inequality. However, corruption was observed to increase the level of income inequality. Similarly, democracy was found to stimulate income inequality among the sampled countries. Third, when the countries were disaggregated into their various income groups, the results showed that public debt increases income inequality in low-income countries but reduces income inequality in lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income countries. Income tax and government consumption were found to have no effect on income inequality across the four income groups. Health expenditure increases income inequality in low-income, lower-middle-income, and high-income countries but reduces income inequality in upper-middle-income countries. Education expenditure reduces income inequality in high-income countries but has no significant impact in low-income, lower-middle-income, or upper-middle-income countries. Fourth, the effect of institutional quality with respect to various income groups showed that government effectiveness tends to increase income inequality in lower-middle-income countries, reduces income inequality only in high-income countries, and showed no effect on income inequality in low-income, or upper-middle-income countries. More so, corruption appears to reduce income inequality in lower-middle-income countries but has no influence on income inequality in low-income, upper-middle-income, or high-income countries. Similarly, democracy has no impact on income inequality across the four income groups. Fifth, with respect to the control variables, GDP per capita, foreign direct investment, and Urbanization  consistently reduce income inequality, population growth increases income inequality, trade openness showed mixed results on income inequality, and surprisingly, inflation appears to reduce income inequality.
-

Description:

Doctor of Philosophy (Development Administration) (Ph.D.(Development Administration))
Doctor of Philosophy (Development Administration) (Ph.D.(Development Administration))

Keyword(s):

Fiscal Policy
Institutions
Income Inequality

Type:

Dissertation
ดุษฎีนิพนธ์

Language:

en

Rights:

National Institute of Development Administration

URI:

https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/6063
Show full item record

Files in this item (CONTENT)

Thumbnail
View
  • 6010131007.pdf ( 4,697.57 KB )

ทรัพยากรสารสนเทศทั้งหมดในคลังปัญญา ใช้เพื่อประโยชน์ทางการเรียนการสอนและการค้นคว้าเท่านั้น และต้องมีการอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มาทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ ห้ามดัดแปลงเนื้อหา และทำสำเนาต่อ รวมถึงไม่ให้อนุญาตนำไปใช้ประโยชน์เพื่อการค้า ไม่ว่ากรณีใด ๆ ทั้งสิ้น



This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Dissertations, Theses, Term Papers [191]

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

Copyright © National Institute of Development Administration | สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์
Library and Information Center | สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
Email: NIDAWR@nida.ac.th    Chat: Facebook Messenger    Facebook: NIDAWisdomRepository
 

 

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

Copyright © National Institute of Development Administration | สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์
Library and Information Center | สำนักบรรณสารการพัฒนา
Email: NIDAWR@nida.ac.th    Chat: Facebook Messenger    Facebook: NIDAWisdomRepository
 

 

‹›×