The upper bounds of the ruin probability for an insurance discrete-time risk model with proportional reinsurance and investment
Files
Issued Date
2018
Issued Date (B.E.)
2561
Available Date
Copyright Date
Resource Type
Series
Edition
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
No. of Pages/File Size
79 leaves
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
Other identifier(s)
Identifier(s)
b203167
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
National Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Center
Bibliographic Citation
Citation
Apichart Luesamai (2018). The upper bounds of the ruin probability for an insurance discrete-time risk model with proportional reinsurance and investment. Retrieved from: https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/6104.
Title
The upper bounds of the ruin probability for an insurance discrete-time risk model with proportional reinsurance and investment
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
item.page.dc.contrubutor.advisor
Advisor's email
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s)
Abstract
In this study, the two upper bounds of the ruin probability for discrete time
risk model derived by adding two controlled factors to the classical discrete time risk
model: proportional reinsurance and investment are proposed. These upper bounds are
derived using an inductive method and rely on a recursive form of the finite time
and/or an integral equation of ultimate (infinite time) of ruin probability which is also
derived in this study. Both of the upper bounds are formulated by the assumption that
the retention level of reinsurance and the amount of stock investment during each
time period are controlled as constant values. The first upper bound can be used with
the finite time ruin probability and the ultimate ruin probability under the condition
that the value of the adjustment coefficient can be found. The second upper bound is
formulated by a using new worse than used distribution. This upper bound can only
be used with the finite time ruin probability, and its value can be found even though
the value of the adjustment coefficient does not exist. However, this upper bound has
limitations on the total claims amount which the total claims amount in each time
period must come from the summation of independent and identically distributed
(i.i.d.) claim amounts, and the number of claims is also i.i.d. in each time period.
Two numerical examples are used to consider the characteristics of the derived upper bounds. In the first example, the total claims amount is assumed to follow an exponential distribution from which the value of the adjustment coefficient can be found to show the first derived upper bound. In the other example, the claim amounts
are set as a Pareto distribution, from which the adjustment coefficient cannot be found and is used to show some of the characteristics of the second upper bound. Moreover, real-life motor insurance claims data that fits a log-normal distribution is used to show the application of the derived upper bounds. Under the different agreements of the three aforementioned situations, it was found that the values of the two upper bounds derived in this study responded to the two additional controlled factors in the proposed risk model in the same direction.
Two numerical examples are used to consider the characteristics of the derived upper bounds. In the first example, the total claims amount is assumed to follow an exponential distribution from which the value of the adjustment coefficient can be found to show the first derived upper bound. In the other example, the claim amounts
are set as a Pareto distribution, from which the adjustment coefficient cannot be found and is used to show some of the characteristics of the second upper bound. Moreover, real-life motor insurance claims data that fits a log-normal distribution is used to show the application of the derived upper bounds. Under the different agreements of the three aforementioned situations, it was found that the values of the two upper bounds derived in this study responded to the two additional controlled factors in the proposed risk model in the same direction.
Table of contents
Description
Thesis (Ph.D. (Statistics))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2018