Surasit VajirakachornSirinon Suwanmolee2022-05-182022-05-182017b201076https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/5785Thesis (Ph.D. (Social Development Administration))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2017The objectives of this dissertation were 1) To study the problem condition and obstacles in Chiangrai earthquakes mitigation according to disaster prevention and mitigation strategy plan. 2) To study the actors in local, provincial and national levels of policies network in Chiangrai earthquakes mitigation 3) To study the guideline to integrate coordination between organizations involved in the earthquakes mitigation in Chiangrai. Data collection started from qualitative research followed by quantitative research.It was found that the problems and obstruction with the policy in the Chiangrai’s preparation for earthquake according to the disaster prevention and mitigation strategy could be described in three dimensions, following the concept of complex adaptive system, which were the organization flexibility, the technical infrastructure, and the cultural openness.1) The organization flexibility dimension. It was found that the power structure in managing the local administration and the district offices was inconsistent. Many organization’s works were redundant. The provincial commanding center did not fully act as the mediator in resource raising and information sharing. The process adjustment according to the complaint feedback was slow. Each organization lack the adaptation and understanding in other organization’s role in the shared mission during the crisis. The earthquake drills were mostly the practice of interior rescue, rather than the practice of commanding between organizations and the affected area.2) The Technical Infrastructure dimension. It was found that the communities lack the skill and the experience in self-organization during the disaster. The local officers did not let the community to participate in the sub-district disaster management planning. Cross-duty resource raising or working in the place of each other were limited. The adjustment of risk management plan according to the professional engineering knowledge was limited. The amendment of the local regulations in building control was not found. And there was the obstruction in spending the budget to prepare for the disaster.3) The Cultural Openness dimension. It was found that the provincial commanding unit perceived that the local administrative organizations and the communities as the weak and passive, rather than being able to self-organize. And the operation officers would only follow the orders. The plan adjustment and the operation in disaster prevention and mitigation in the local level and the provincial level was not continuous. There was also the government culture problems in which the officers in the system lack the conscience to connect with other organization. They would not emphasis the official operation adjustment according to the feedback from the unofficial actors, and would not accept the mission in temporary data management without the permanent structure in the district organization. There was also limited priority for the community and the local capabilities development.The social network analysis demonstrated the relationship of the actors from the government sector, the people sector, and the civil society who were involved in disaster management, that the topology of the network was decentralize. Most relationship were connected to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). As the Chiangrai province had the operation plan during the earthquake that designated the roles of each organization in the emergency phases and had performed the drill previously, the provincial operation was ready and united during the crisis. However, during the recovery phases, the centralized management became the limitation when the provincial unit lack the information system to connect the inter-organization database. The data exchange and resource sharing among the organization could not fully occurred. And the risk estimation for the disaster prevention plan as a whole was also limited.The integrated coordination in disaster risk management should start by adjusting the disaster management power distribution in the provincial level. There should be the inter-organization coordination in the distribution type, which would allow the local administrative organization to flexibly communicate and exchange resources with other organization. There should be the utilization of information technology in data management, and the communication system, which would support the network to adapt its form flexibly. The vertical and centralized relationship should be replaced by the distribution structure, so that the local administrative organization could exchange resources or coordinate with other organizations after the situation unfolded. As for the community level, there should be the knowledge training for people, so that they know how to conduct during the earthquake, as well as the training of risk estimation and building renovation to withstand the seismic activity for the local builders and the community leaders, which would encourage the risk awareness during the preparation for disaster together with the recovery and the disaster risk control.303 leavesapplication/pdfengThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Disaster prevention -- ThailandEarthquakes -- Thailandtext--thesis--doctoral thesis10.14457/NIDA.the.2017.35