The effectiveness of risk-based supervision in the adjustments of capital buffer and portfolio risk: An empirical study of Thai commercial banks
Issued Date
2010
Available Date
Copyright Date
Resource Type
Series
Edition
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
No. of Pages/File Size
207 leaves.
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
DOI
Other identifier(s)
ba187473
Identifier(s)
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
National Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Center
Bibliographic Citation
Citation
Chitkasem Pornprapunt (2010). The effectiveness of risk-based supervision in the adjustments of capital buffer and portfolio risk: An empirical study of Thai commercial banks. Retrieved from: http://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/3430.
Title
The effectiveness of risk-based supervision in the adjustments of capital buffer and portfolio risk: An empirical study of Thai commercial banks
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Advisor's email
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s)
Abstract
As a means to economic growth and development, banking is one of the most
heavily regulated industries due to externalities from banking failures. Banking regulation aims to maintain safety and soundness in order to protect depositors' losses, which may result from insolvency and/or illiquidity. Banking crises have induced policy makers to place emphasis on protective regulatory policy. Therefore, banking policy focuses on the regulation of capital, which is a centerpiece of the government intervention because it can affect risk-taking by bank owners and constitutes a buffer to absorb unexpected losses. The financial microeconomic literature places its interest the relationship between regulatory capital requirements and bank capital and risk taking. Banking examinations are another form of prudential supervision that directly limit and control moral hazard incentives for excessive risk
taking.
This study explicates the interrelations among the public policy process, bank regulations, and financial economics. This study evaluates the effectiveness and impact of banking supervision and examination on banks' moral hazard behaviors. It focuses on the relationship between banking examinations and bank capital and risk taking. In addition, the study extends the investigation to the relationship between banks' franchise value and capital and risk behaviors. The study also discusses and tests the capital buffer theory. The empirical estimations employ panel data from Thai commercial banks' financial statements during the ·period of 2002Q 1 to 2008Q3 and model specifications, which are developed from Shrieves and Dahl's (1992) simultaneous equations with a partial adjustment framework in order to investigate the relationships theoretical proponents. The empirical analyses experiment with the Instrumental Variable (IV); namely, Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), and Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML).
The results of the estimates construe public policy in terms of its evaluation: that risk-based examination is effective in mitigating risk in Thai commercial banks. The negative relationship between changes in capital and portfolio risk is statically significant. Similarly, the results of the estimates indicate a negative relationship between changes in capital buffer and portfolio risk. This study finds that prudential supervision is effective in mitigating risk in Thai commercial banks; however, the capital directive has unintended effects on the changes in the banks' capital and their buffer. This study also finds that the franchise value determines the banks' portfolio risk but not changes in either the capital or capital buffer. The study presents several implications for banking examination development, such as the maroprudential and microprudential implications on countercyclical supervision, and stress testing, which are in line with international standards of Basel Committee in Banking Supervision (BCBS), Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
This study explicates the interrelations among the public policy process, bank regulations, and financial economics. This study evaluates the effectiveness and impact of banking supervision and examination on banks' moral hazard behaviors. It focuses on the relationship between banking examinations and bank capital and risk taking. In addition, the study extends the investigation to the relationship between banks' franchise value and capital and risk behaviors. The study also discusses and tests the capital buffer theory. The empirical estimations employ panel data from Thai commercial banks' financial statements during the ·period of 2002Q 1 to 2008Q3 and model specifications, which are developed from Shrieves and Dahl's (1992) simultaneous equations with a partial adjustment framework in order to investigate the relationships theoretical proponents. The empirical analyses experiment with the Instrumental Variable (IV); namely, Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), and Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML).
The results of the estimates construe public policy in terms of its evaluation: that risk-based examination is effective in mitigating risk in Thai commercial banks. The negative relationship between changes in capital and portfolio risk is statically significant. Similarly, the results of the estimates indicate a negative relationship between changes in capital buffer and portfolio risk. This study finds that prudential supervision is effective in mitigating risk in Thai commercial banks; however, the capital directive has unintended effects on the changes in the banks' capital and their buffer. This study also finds that the franchise value determines the banks' portfolio risk but not changes in either the capital or capital buffer. The study presents several implications for banking examination development, such as the maroprudential and microprudential implications on countercyclical supervision, and stress testing, which are in line with international standards of Basel Committee in Banking Supervision (BCBS), Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Table of contents
Description
Dissertation (Ph.D. (Development Administration))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2010.