Developing IQA system for graduate-only institution : case study of NIDA (National Institute of Development Administration)

dc.contributor.advisorChiraprapha Akaraborwornth
dc.contributor.authorThantita Sathirachaiyawitth
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T07:44:02Z
dc.date.available2024-04-19T07:44:02Z
dc.date.issued2019th
dc.date.issuedBE2562th
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D. (Human Resource and Organization Development))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2019th
dc.description.abstractAn Internal Quality Assurance system (IQA) in Thai higher education has been developed continuously since 2007 by the Office of the Higher Education Commission of Thailand (OHEC). According to an announcement of the Internal Quality Assurance Commission on Higher Education under the heading “Regulations and Guidelines regarding Higher Education Internal Quality Assurance 2014”, the IQA system was adjusted in two major, different, areas than the previous versions. One of these areas is that each institution has an opportunity to choose its own IQA system. The purpose of this study was to develop an IQA system for a graduate-only institution, and the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) was adopted as the case study. The research approach included a focus group and interviews which were used to gather qualitative data regarding internal quality assurance processes in the Thai and NIDA contexts. Data from the focus group, the interviews, and the literature review were integrated and developed into a questionnaire that was used as the major research tool in the Delphi-style research process. Two rounds of the Delphi process were conducted. Subject matter experts (SMEs) rated each question for its relevance to indicate the importance and the level of implementation of quality assurance processes at NIDA.The findings of this study were that the NIDA IQA system needed to have 3 levels of assessment: the program level, faculty level, and institutional level. It was also found that the system should address 24 quality criteria with 72 items under them. Among those 72 items were 7 items under human resource management, working systems, program, student development and support, and public relations quality criteria that should not be excluded from the system as they had perfect Interquartile Range (IQR). As well, a further recommendation was that the quality assurance processes should be conducted annually, to be conducted by a committee of at least 3 persons, each of whom should have knowledge of IQA, and each member of the committee should have experience in being a program director or have held a position related to IQA.th
dc.format.extent152 leavesth
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfth
dc.identifier.doi10.14457/NIDA.the.2019.157
dc.identifier.otherb211059th
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/6828th
dc.language.isoength
dc.publisherNational Institute of Development Administrationth
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.th
dc.subject.otherQuality assuranceth
dc.titleDeveloping IQA system for graduate-only institution : case study of NIDA (National Institute of Development Administration)th
dc.typetext::thesis::doctoral thesisth
mods.genreDissertationth
mods.physicalLocationNational Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Centerth
thesis.degree.departmentGraduate School of Human Resource Developmentth
thesis.degree.disciplineHuman Resource and Organization Developmentth
thesis.degree.grantorNational Institute of Development Administrationth
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralth
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyth

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
b211059.pdf
Size:
4.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.73 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: