Compensation determination factors for the executive personnel groups of state enterprises in Thailand : a case study of group a state enterprises in Thailand
Issued Date
2019
Available Date
Copyright Date
Resource Type
Series
Edition
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
No. of Pages/File Size
345 leaves
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
DOI
Other identifier(s)
b210930
Identifier(s)
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
National Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Center
Bibliographic Citation
Citation
Gornkrit Sakronsatian (2019). Compensation determination factors for the executive personnel groups of state enterprises in Thailand : a case study of group a state enterprises in Thailand. Retrieved from: https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/5200.
Title
Compensation determination factors for the executive personnel groups of state enterprises in Thailand : a case study of group a state enterprises in Thailand
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Advisor's email
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s)
Abstract
This research aims to find personal characteristic factors of the executive personnel groups (EPGs), by considering the characteristics of an organization, which leads to different compensation determination. The researcher also adds political relationship factor into consideration. The researcher uses the mixed-method research by in-depth interviews with 25 personnel who involve with the compensation determination process of the target group. Questionnaires were used to collect information from 347 employees in state enterprises from level 5 or assistant director level of a department onward. The result shows that 1) State enterprise A is in an industry with a low number of competitors. The form of this industry is considered to be concentrated. The environment of competitiveness for this industry consists of only a handful of big players. At the same time, State enterprise B is in a monopolized business. It is difficult for a new player to enter the market and be competitive with both state enterprises. 2) Accessibility to resources (b = -.327), determined compensation from other players in the market (b = .224), management experience (b = .224), and ability to create changes (b = .135), are the factors that determine compensation differences of the EPGs in State enterprise A. All variables have 30% of predictive efficacy (Adjusted R2 = .300). While executive board (b = -.296), determined compensation from other players in the market (b = -.292), management experience (b = -.249), and ability to create changes (b = .216), are the factors that determine compensation differences of the EPGs in State enterprise B. All variables have 28% of predictive efficacy (Adjusted R2 = .280). 3) Political relationship factors are more influential in recruitment than determined compensation for the EPGs.
Table of contents
Description
Thesis (D.P.A.)--National Institute of Development Administration, 2019