Risk management and performance of state enterprises in Thailand
Issued Date
2015
Issued Date (B.E.)
2558
Available Date
Copyright Date
Resource Type
Series
Edition
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
No. of Pages/File Size
203 leaves
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
Other identifier(s)
b191696
Identifier(s)
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
National Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Center
Bibliographic Citation
Citation
Natthita Rungwatthana (2015). Risk management and performance of state enterprises in Thailand. Retrieved from: https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/6366.
Title
Risk management and performance of state enterprises in Thailand
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
item.page.dc.contrubutor.advisor
Advisor's email
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s)
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to investigate the elements having impacts
on the quality of risk management practiced by state enterprises in Thailand, and to
examine the connection between quality of risk management and the performance of
state enterprises. The research employed the quantitative method using a survey
response from 36 state enterprises, as well as secondary data collected from the
database of the State Enterprise Policy Office, and the qualitative method conducted
by means of in-depth interviews with 3 state enterprises applying best practice in their
risk management.
The results from both methods indicated that among six critical success factors of risk management-size of the entity, investment in risk management information technology, investment in the development of human resources associated with risk management, risk management competency, risk management organizational structure, and risk culture-all had positive impacts on the quality of risk management. Risk culture distinctively yielded positive results in every statistical analysis, whereas other elements revealed a connection in certain statistical methods only.
Concurrently, both the quantitative and qualitative research results confirmed a connection between the quality of risk management and the effective performance of state enterprises. Thus, the government should meliorate the quality of risk management implemented by state enterprises, particularly by fostering risk management culture to achieve better performance. This improvement will create competitive advantage, empowering state enterprises as a mechanism for the sustainable development of Thailand.
The results from both methods indicated that among six critical success factors of risk management-size of the entity, investment in risk management information technology, investment in the development of human resources associated with risk management, risk management competency, risk management organizational structure, and risk culture-all had positive impacts on the quality of risk management. Risk culture distinctively yielded positive results in every statistical analysis, whereas other elements revealed a connection in certain statistical methods only.
Concurrently, both the quantitative and qualitative research results confirmed a connection between the quality of risk management and the effective performance of state enterprises. Thus, the government should meliorate the quality of risk management implemented by state enterprises, particularly by fostering risk management culture to achieve better performance. This improvement will create competitive advantage, empowering state enterprises as a mechanism for the sustainable development of Thailand.
Table of contents
Description
Thesis (D.P.A.)--National Institute of Development Administration, 2015