Public Speeches of the People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) leader: the critical discourse analysis on social conflict
Issued Date
2021
Issued Date (B.E.)
2564
Available Date
Copyright Date
Resource Type
Series
Edition
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
No. of Pages/File Size
558 leaves
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
Other identifier(s)
b214320
Identifier(s)
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
National Institute of Development Administration. Library and Information Center
Bibliographic Citation
Citation
Noppajakkr Sondhinera (2021). Public Speeches of the People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) leader: the critical discourse analysis on social conflict. Retrieved from: https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/6862.
Title
Public Speeches of the People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) leader: the critical discourse analysis on social conflict
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
item.page.dc.contrubutor.advisor
Advisor's email
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s)
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to study the discourse of the People’s Democratic
Reform Committee leader, Suthep Thuagsuban’s public speaking from 2013- 2014 by
using critical discourse analysis. 94 videos are selectively collected according to the
triangulation technique for the document data. Research findings show numerous
discourses been used during the six-month-long protest; each is developed specifically
for the cause. To see the development of discourses and surrounding contexts,
researcher divided the duration of protest to 3 periods; the initiative period, the peak
period, and the maintain period.
First, the initiative period was the boosted start of the anti- graft amnesty bill
protest which took place from October to the end of November 2013. It was positive
that political purpose of the anti-graft amnesty bill protest was changed once it became
the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) which was to eradicate Thaksin
Shinawatra and his influence over Thai politics. Thus, the major discourse found in this
period was “Thaksin Regime. ” Discourse of Thaksin Regime had constructed social
reality about the corrupted system in the contemporary Thai politics, including
corruption, bureaucratic system abuse. Surrounding context was the conflict of the
corruption cases by Thaksin Shinawatra and his sister Yingluck Shinawatra’ s
government which was a sequence of political corruptions. And Yingluck Shinawatra
tried to make legitimacy laundry for her brother by passing the graft amnesty bill and
another general election. Another discourse was called “ allegiance to Thai Monarch” which helped identifying the PDRC movement as a protest of the good people of
Thailand. Allegiance to Thai Monarch also gave the protest the moral support and a
mutual purpose of devotion.
Second, the peak period was happened after the PDRC grew in number, over
million people had joined the protest. With its strategic movement, Bangkok Shutdown
( divided to 13 rally sites), being platform for rice farmer protest and other political
events, PDRC had successfully made a hard time for Yingluck Shinawatra’ s
Administration. Once, PDRC gained much political pressure, it became a target from
the government and government’ s supporting crowd, the Red- Shirt. Suthep
Thuagsuban as the PDRC leader was being defamed in attempt to dismiss the protest.
This surrounding context made discourse of “Uncle Headman” emerged to construct
body-image of a good leader. It was consisted of a story of Suthep Thuagsuban since
he was a Headman from Surat Thani whose dream was to be people’s representative,
until he had become one of the most powerful political figures of Thai politics. Yet, he
willingly gave up his title to lead the protest of PDRC, so the prominent politician
became a people’s uncle headman, and the medium (host body of the collective mind),
and the holy monk who kept his ordain to preserve the good and righteousness of the
protest. Apart from Uncle Headman, there was a discourse of “ peaceful protest”
because the surrounding context was full of violence done onto the PDRC by the
government’s extremist supporters.
Lastly, the maintain period which was marked when all PDRC rally sites had
retreated to its last precinct, Lumpini Park for security and changes in its movement.
By limiting its activities and sites, PDRC could pursue its goal of reforms. While
Yingluck Shinawatra’s government had been exhausted from countering the protest,
many conflicts had been concluded by the courts. It was an opportunity for PDRC to
hammer at the government with all its strength. But it was a time for the extremist
supporters of Yingluck Shinawatra desperately resorted an absurd idea of dividing the
Kingdom. So, in this period there were various discourses, including reform,
bureaucratic friends to secure the connection between the protest and the bureaucrats,
soldiers, and polices. In this period, the evolving uncle headman and allegiance to Thai
Monarch had played their part to strengthen the cause and common purpose of
patriotism against an idea of dividing Kingdom.
Table of contents
Description
Thesis (Ph.D. (Social Development Administration))--National Institute of Development Administration, 2021